Roberts et al v. Carton
| Lisa Roberts, Bart Roberts, Tommy Welch, Sally Welch, Gavin Nelson, Kenny Hemstead, Lisa Barbee, Kevin McNeil, John Tennis and Ruth Crossen |
| Mark Carton |
| 3:2008cv01071 |
| September 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| John V. Acosta |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
Opinion and Order: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 70 . Signed on 6/5/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)
|
|
Filing
70
Findings & Recommendation - Kevin McNeil's individual claims in this case should be dismissed, with prejudice, and he should be barred from testifying in this matter unless and until he complies with the court's prior orders establishing ap propriate procedures for securing his testimony. Objections to the Court's findings are due on or before 5/21/09. If a party objects to the Court's findings, another party may file a response to those objections within fourteen days of the filing date of the objections. Signed on 5/7/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 45 as my own opinion, 5 . Signed on 2/2/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
