McGuire et al v. Clackamas County Counsel et al
| David R. McGuire, Arlene B. McGuire and Crystal Springs Assembly |
| Clackamas County Counsel, Scott Ciecko, Ronald E. Cinniger, Kim Priest, Ken Spiegle, Clackamas County and State of Oregon |
| 3:2008cv01098 |
| September 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Clackamas |
| John V. Acosta |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 84 and, GRANTS Defendants' Motion 70 for Summary Judgment. Signed on 01/19/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See Order attached for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
84
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION - Defendants' motion for summary judgment 70 should be GRANTED. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 11/24/2010. If objections are filed, a response to those objections may be filed within 14 days of being served a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement. Dated this 10th day of November, 2010, by US Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER: Adopts in part Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 59 and, accordingly, GRANTS Defendants' Motion 31 with prejudice as to Defendant Scott Ciecko. The Court, however, refers this matter back to the Magistrate Judge. Signed on 11/24/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (cib)
|
|
Filing
59
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION by Judge Acosta - The County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 31 should be GRANTED and the claims against them should be dismissed with prejudice. The Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a District Judge. Objections, if any, are due by 11/10/09. If objections are filed, a party may file a response to those objections within 10 days of being served with a copy of the objections. (peg)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 48 and, accordingly, DENIES Dorothy H. Mead's Motion to Intervene 27 Signed on 9/30/09, by United States District Judge Anna J. Brown. (peg)
|
|
Filing
48
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION - Mead's motion 27 for intervention should be DENIED. The Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a district judge for review. Objections, if any, are due September 11, 2009. If no objections are filed, then the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, then a response is due within 10 days after being served with a copy of the objections are filed. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement. Signed on 8/27/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
