Lewis v. WFS Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jonathon Lewis
Defendant: WFS Financial, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv01163
Filed: October 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Polk
Presiding Judge: Garr M. King
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Opinion and Order - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 16 is GRANTED. Signed on 1/7/10 by Judge Garr M. King. (mja)
May 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants Matthew Olafson and City of Monmouth's Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss (#5) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/06/09 by Judge Garr M. King. (pvh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. WFS Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathon Lewis
Represented By: Keith L Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WFS Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?