Wheatstraw, LLC v. Mason et al
| Wheatstraw, LLC |
| Linda-Darnell Mason, Tammy Delaney, Michael Edward Delaney and All Others |
| Michael-Edward and Tammie-Marie |
| 3:2008cv01176 |
| October 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| Dennis J. Hubel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER: I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation 23 as it applies to defendant Linda-Darnell Mason. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Wheatstraw's Motion for Attorney Fees 16 and Bill of Costs 19 are granted. I award attorney fees of $2,280.00 and costs of $20.00. Signed on 3/18/2009 by Judge Garr M. King. (See formal order, 2-pages) (ecp)
|
|
Filing
23
Findings & Recommendation: Wheatstraw's request for attorney's fees in the amount of $2,280.00, and costs in the amount of $20.00 (doc. ## 16, 20) should be GRANTED, with the proviso that to the extent Wheatstraw recovers contract ual attorney's fees in the Circuit Court, any fees awarded in this case that constitute a double recovery for Wheatstraw not be awarded. (In re Bill of Costs 19 , Motion for Attorney Fees 16 .) Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 3/11/2009; response(s) due 3/25/09. Signed on 2/24/09 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (see formal 6-page f&r) (kb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
