Blocker v. Wells Fargo Bank
| Tyrone Blocker |
| Wells Fargo Bank |
| 3:2008cv01196 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| Paul Papak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
ORDER: The Findings and Recommendation 134 is adopted in its entirety. Defendant's Motion for Summmy Judgment 89 is granted as to each of plaintiffs claims in this action, and denied as to defendant's counterclaim for fees. Plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed on 5/5/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (dmd)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER: Adopting in Part Findings and Recommendation 134 ; Denying Motion to Strike 147 . Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file supplemental objections that refute defendant's summary judgment and any supporting affidavits. If plaintiff fails to file a response, or fails to produce sufficient evidence, the Findings and Recommendation will be adopted in its entirety. Signed on 3/30/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (dmd)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER: Wells Fargo's motion 8 to dismiss Blocker's originally-filed complaint is denied as moot, Wells Fargo's first motion 12 to strike is denied as moot, Wells Fargo's motion 14 to dismiss Blocker's putative fi rst amended complaint is denied as moot, Blocker's first motion 18 for leave to file an amended complaint is denied as moot, Wells Fargo's motion 22 to dismiss Blocker's putative second amended complaint is denied as moot, Blocker& #039;s second motion 26 for leave to file an amended complaint is granted, Wells Fargo's motion 29 to dismiss Blocker's putative third amended complaint is granted with prejudice as to Blocker's claims for fraud and invasion of pri vacy, granted without prejudice as to Blocker's claims for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000a and for defamation of Blocker's business, and is otherwise denied, and Wells Fargo's second motion 32 to strike is denied. The Clerk is directed to file as Blocker's "Amended Complaint" the proposed pleading filed in support of Blocker's second motion 26 for leave to file an amended complaint. Signed on 9/1/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (gm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blocker v. Wells Fargo Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyrone Blocker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
