Du Ju v. Kelly Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Frances Du Ju
Defendant: Kelly Service, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv01213
Filed: October 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 133 OPINION and ORDER: Granting in Part Motion for Summary Judgment 118 ; Granting in Part Motion to Strike 127 . Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on all claims aside from plaintiff's wage claim pursuant to ORS 652.140(1), that plaintiff's final paycheck was untimely. Signed on 9/28/2011 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (sd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Du Ju v. Kelly Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frances Du Ju
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?