CRM Collateral II, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon et al
Plaintiff: |
CRM Collateral II, Inc. |
Defendant: |
KeyBank National Association and Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon |
Case Number: |
3:2008cv01266 |
Filed: |
October 27, 2008 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
Office: |
Portland (3) Office |
County: |
Outside State |
Presiding Judge: |
Paul Papak |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 10, 2010 |
Filing
158
OPINION & ORDER: CRM's motion (08-1266: 140 ; 09-1135: 118 ) for summary judgment is Granted as to its cross-claim for breach of statutory warranty and otherwise denied as moot, TriMet's motion (08-1266: 147 ; 09-1135: 125 ) for summary judgment is Denied as Moot, and CRM is awarded damages in the in the amount of $3,180,082.50, plus prejudgment interest from July 27, 2010. All remaining claims for relief are Dismissed with prejudice as moot, and all pending motions are Denied as Moot. A final judgment shall be prepared. Signed on 11/10/10 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (Associated Cases: 3:08-cv-01266-PK, 3:09-cv-01135-PK) (gm)
|
May 26, 2010 |
Filing
138
OPINION & ORDER: KeyBank's Motion for Summary Judgment 110 is Denied, TriMet's Motion for Summary Judgment 115 is Granted as to CRM's claim for declaratory judgment, Granted as to the Guetzko plaintiffs' claim for decl aratory judgment, Granted as to CRM's claim for common-law fraud, Granted as to CRM's crossclaims for unjust enrichment, money had and received, breach of contract, and breach of the statutory warranty arising under O.R.S. 75.1100(1)(a), a nd otherwise Denied, and CRM's Motion for Summary Judgment 118 is Granted as to the narrow question of TriMet's liability in connection with CRM's crossclaim for breach of the statutory warranty arising under O.R.S. 75.1100(1)(b) and otherwise Denied. Signed on 5/26/10 by Judge Paul Papak. (Associated Cases: 3:08-cv-01266-PK, 3:09-cv-01135-PK) (gm)
|
December 22, 2009 |
Filing
98
Opinion & Order: The constructive motion for reconsideration implicit in CRM's Supplemental Memorandum 86 in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted in Part and Denied in Part as follows: CRM's Motion for Part ial Summary Judgment 37 is Granted as to TriMet's claim for declaratory judgment to the extent TriMet seeks a declaration that CRM was at any material time in default under the Contract only, and is otherwise Denied. The constructive and express motions for reconsideration contained in TriMet's Memorandum 87 Regarding Supplemental Summary Judgment Issues are Denied. Signed on 12/22/09 by Judge Paul Papak.(Associated Cases: 3:08-cv-01266-PK, 3:09-cv-01135-PK) (gm)
|
September 18, 2009 |
Filing
84
OPINION & ORDER: CRM's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 37 and TriMet's Motion for Summary Judgment 49 are each Denied. At the court appearance scheduled for 2:30PM on 9/21/2009, counsel for the parties should be prepared to discuss whether further summary judgment proceedings are warranted in light of the court's disposition of the parties' motions. Signed on 9/18/09 by Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?