Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Management et al
| Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n |
| Bureau of Land Management, Dana Shuford and Joan Suther |
| 3:2008cv01271 |
| October 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Multnomah |
| Garr M. King |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
Opinion and Order: Granting ONDA's Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 124 , 137 in the reduced sum of $63,449.42. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/21/2016 by Judge Garr M. King. (ecp)
|
|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER ON RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: ONDA's Motion for Summary Judgment 113 is granted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 114 is denied. Additional briefing on the appropriate remedy is ordered as set forth in this opinion. Signed on 8/19/2015 by Judge Garr M. King. (pg)
|
|
Filing
95
Opinion and Order - Granting in part and denying in part ONDAs Motion for Summary Judgment 47 and BLMs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 63 . ONDAs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Motion for Preliminary Hearing 46 is denied as moot, and its Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record 86 is granted given the BLMs agreement to include in the administrative record the materials requested by ONDA. I find the BLM is not required to issue a supplemental EIS with respect to the sage-g rouse publications, but it is required to evaluate the significance of the Greater Echanis project in light of the East and West Ridge portions of the project constituting reasonably foreseeable actions.In addition, because I find the IMP prohibits v egetative manipulation when not a pretreatment for prescribed burning, the IBLAs decision is arbitrary and capricious on this issue and the BLM is not permitted to undertake such actions. Finally, the IBLA decision is remanded to the Department of In terior to address ONDAs argument that the off-road motorized use in WSAscontemplated by the Juniper Treatment Project is a violation of the Steens Act. The parties are to confer on a proposed form of judgment and submit it to the Court by December 5, 2011. Signed on 11/15/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (See formal Opinion and Order, 56-pages) (ecp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
