Bowers v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Kelsey Bowers |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC and Trans Union LLC |
| 3:2008cv01436 |
| December 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Consumer Credit Office |
| Washington |
| John V. Acosta |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC - This matter, having come before the Court on plaintiff's unopposed motion 34 to dismiss defendant Trans Union, LLC, and pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2); NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that plaintiff's claims against Trans Union, LLC only, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. Signed on 10/27/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 25 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Trans Union's Amended Motion To Dismiss 21 is denied. Signed on 7/15/09 by Judge Garr M. King. (cib)
|
|
Filing
25
Findings & Recommendation - Trans Union's amended motion 21 to dismiss should be DENIED. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 7/10/2009. If a party files objections to the Court's findings, another party may file a response to those objections within fourteen days of the filing of the objections. Signed on 6/26/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
