Claim of MDE, an individual proceeding under an assumed name, against the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon and the Future Claims Trust
Claimant: M.D.E.
Case Number: 3:2008mc09261
Filed: November 25, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL: The abovecaptioned case and all claims for relief having been fully compromised and resolved between the parties by agreement, Plaintiff and Defendants move this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedu re 41 (a), based upon the following stipulation of counsel, for a dismissal of all of Plaintiffs claims for relief with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party, with all parties to bear their own costs and fees incurred herein. Signed on January 2, 2009 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (eo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Claim of MDE, an individual proceeding under an assumed name, against the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon and the Future Claims Trust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: M.D.E.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?