Davis v. Nooth

Davis v. Nooth

Petitioner:	John L. Davis
Respondent:	Mark Nooth
Case Number:	3:2009cv00218
Filed:	February 23, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Malheur
Presiding Judge:	Garr M. King
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2011	Filing 39 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED, with prejudice. In the event petitioner appeals from this decision, it is ordered that a certificate of appealability is DENIED due to petitioners failure to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/18/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (gw)
May 17, 2011	Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED, without prejudice. In the event petitioner appeals from this decision, it is ordered that a certificate of appealability is DENIED due to petitioners failure to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/17/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (gw)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2011

Filing 39 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED, with prejudice. In the event petitioner appeals from this decision, it is ordered that a certificate of appealability is DENIED due to petitioners failure to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/18/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (gw)

May 17, 2011

Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED, without prejudice. In the event petitioner appeals from this decision, it is ordered that a certificate of appealability is DENIED due to petitioners failure to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/17/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (gw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Nooth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: John L. Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?