Pat Pellegrini Flooring Corporation v. Itex Corporation et al
| Pat Pellegrini Flooring Corporation |
| Itex Corporation, Nyto Trade Incorporated, John Castoro and Izzy Garcia |
| 3:2009cv00376 |
| April 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Outside State |
| John V. Acosta |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendations as to both the non-dispositive motion to amend and the dispositive motions to dismiss, and I ADOPT Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#49) as my own op inion. PPF's Motion to Amend the Complaint (#23) is GRANTED, subject to the condition that PPF's second amended complaint shall include the language of paragraph 37 of the Amended Complaint. ITEX's Motion to Dismiss (#30) isDENIED with respect to PPF's first claim for breach of contract and GRANTED with respect to PPF's other four claims. The NYTO defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#4) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is denied with regard to the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, but granted with regard to NYTO and Mr. Castoro's motion to dismiss for insufficient service. Signed on 3/16/10 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
