Bertrand et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
| Shelton R Bertrand and Rebecca M Bertrand |
| Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and First American Title Insurance Company |
| 3:2009cv00857 |
| July 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Clackamas |
| Robert E. Jones |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
Opinion and Order. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (# 27 , 33 ) are GRANTED. Any other pending motions are denied as moot and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 3/23/2011 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (sd)
|
|
Filing
52
Opinion and Order: I decline to resolve the pending motions for summary judgment and defer the motions to permit the parties to submit supplemental briefing to explain how the issues in the present case may be distinguished from those before the court in Rinegard-Guirma. Accordingly, defendants may file a supplemental brief as described, not to exceed 15 pages, within 30 days. Plaintiffs have an additional 30 days to file a response, not to exceed 15 pages. No further briefing will be accepted without leave of court. Related: Motion for Summary Judgment 27 , and Motion for Summary Judgment 33 . Signed on 11/1/2010 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
