Holdner v. Oregon Department of Agriculture
Petitioner: William F. Holdner
Respondent: Oregon Department of Agriculture
Case Number: 3:2009cv00979
Filed: August 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated, Defendants' Motion for Costs and Attorney Fees 96 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 5th day of January, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
July 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 92 Opinion and Order. Holdner's Motion for Reconsideration 70 is DENIED and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 73 is GRANTED.(see 14 page opinion and order for further details) Signed on 7/5/11 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (cib)
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, Holdner's motion for leave to amend 60 is DENIED. Dated this 15th day of September by US Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER - Respondents' Rule 12(e) motion 35 is GRANTED and Holdner is ordered to make the pleadings more definite by filing an amended complaint that incorporates all of his allegations, by March 15, 2010. Signed on 2/25/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
December 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER. Petitioner timely filed objections to Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation. I have, therefore, given those portions of the Findings and Recommendation a de novo review. I agree with Magistrate Judge Acosta's analysis and conclusion. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (doc.14), and GRANT the State of Oregon's motion to dismiss the complaint (doc.3), with leave to refile. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/23/09 by Judge James A. Redden. (pvh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holdner v. Oregon Department of Agriculture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William F. Holdner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Oregon Department of Agriculture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?