Juiceme, LLC et al v. Booster Juice Limited Partnership et al
Case Number: 3:2009cv01506
Filed: December 28, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Ancer L. Haggerty
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 81 Order Confirming Arbitration Award and Judgment. Signed on 06/24/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
July 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Opinion and Order. Court DENIED Motion 29 to Dismiss of Canada Defendants AW Holdings Corporation and Dale Wishewan and STAYS Plaintiffs' claims against these Defendants pending arbitration of these claims in accordance with the terms of the FAs and RDA. Court DENIED the Motion 31 to Dismiss by US Defendants' Booster Juice Limited Partnership, AW Limited Partnership, AW Holdings, Inc., and Jonathan Amack and STAYS Plaintiffs' claims against these Defendants pending arbitrati on of Plaintiffs' claims against these Defendants or until an arbitrator determines US Defendants' inability to continue to pay its share of arbitration costs constitutes failure, neglect, or refusal to arbitrate in violation of the arbitration agreement. Parties are directed to file joint status reports every 90 days beginning 11/1/2010, or at any time intervening events warrant the Court's attention. See 23 page Order. Signed on 07/30/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juiceme, LLC et al v. Booster Juice Limited Partnership et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?