Gutierrez v. Williams et al
Plaintiff: Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez
Defendant: Max Williams, Commissary Store Operator and Access Catalogue Company
Case Number: 3:2009cv06204
Filed: July 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Malheur
Presiding Judge: Garr M. King
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 110 Judgment. Signed on 1/6/2012 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc)
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER: Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 58 . Signed on 6/29/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc)
December 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Order - Defendants' motion to stay discovery, pending resolution oftheir motion to dismiss (#42), is DENIED given the fact thatplaintiff is seeking discovery in order to properly serve all nameddefendants. Plaintiff's motion to compel disco very (#38) is DENIEDdue to plaintiff's failure to demonstrate that he served a properrequest for interrogatories upon defendants, and that defendantsfailed to timely respond thereto. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 & 37.Plaintiff's motion for clarif ication (#39) is DENIED. Thiscourt previously addressed plaintiff's service questions. SeeOrder (#37) (dated Oct. 19, 2010). Finally, plaintiff's motion forextension of time (#46) is DENIED AS MOOT given the briefingschedule outlined below. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff may file any further response todefendants' motion to dismiss by December 23, 2010. Defendants mayfile a reply by January 7, 2011. Defendants' motion to dismiss(#42) shall be taken UNDER ADVISEMENT on January 10, 2011.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motions to compeldiscovery (#38), for clarification (#39), and for extension of time(#46); and defendants' motion to stay discovery (#41) are DENIED.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gutierrez v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Max Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissary Store Operator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Access Catalogue Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?