Wilcox v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
3:2009cv06349 |
December 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Dennis J. Hubel |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER Approving Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. After considering Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees, and counsel for Defendant having no objection, Order is hereby granted in the sum of $12,999 as full settlement of al l claims for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Commissioner shall deduct from $12,999 an administrative assessment under 42 U.S.C. § 406(d) and pay Plaintiff's counsel the balance. In addition, Plaintiff's counsel will refund to Plaintiff the EAJA fee of $5,234.69. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2012, by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh) |
Filing 31 ORDER for Payment of Attorney Fees Pursuant to EAJA. Signed on 12/28/2011 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh) |
Filing 26 ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 16 and remand this matter for the immediate payment of benefits. Signed on 9/21/2011 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (sd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilcox v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.