Rabadan v. USA
| Jesus Fierros Rabadan |
| USA |
| 3:2009cv70013 |
| August 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| Michael W. Mosman |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1
Opinion And Order as to Jesus Fierros Rabadan (1). For the reasons given above, I DENY defendant's Motion for Tolling of One-Year Limitation Period to File a § 2255 Motion 77. I also DENY defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence 75. Signed on 11/5/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rabadan v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jesus Fierros Rabadan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
