Smith et al v. Healy et al

Smith et al v. Healy et al

Case Number:	3:2010cv00072
Filed:	January 22, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland Office
Presiding Judge:	Anna J. Brown
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 24, 2011	Filing 64 ORDER by Judge Anna J. Brown. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 54 and DIRECTS Defendants to provide a detailed accounting limited to the time they spent on Plaintiffs' clai ms for violation of Oregon's UTSA and breach of fiduciary duty together with supporting documentation no later than 06/3/2011. Any objections to Defendants' accounting limited to these two claims shall be filed no later than 06/10/2011. No reply permitted. Signed on 05/23/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See 12 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
October 7, 2010	Filing 34 ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion 13 for Remand to State Court; GRANTS the Motion 9 for Summary Judgment of Defendants Dennis Healy, Holly Healy, Sky Corporation, Ltd., and RKD Premium Products, Inc.; and DENIES as futile Pla intiffs' Motion 24 for Leave to File [Second] Amended Complaint. The Court DIRECTS the parties to confer as to whether the Counterclaim will be pursued in light of the Court's rulings and as to whether any additional claims or defenses will be asserted by any party. the parties shall submit a joint status report no later than 10/29/2010, containing a proposed case management plan to address any remaining issues. Signed on 10/07/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See 37 page Order. (bb)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 24, 2011

Filing 64 ORDER by Judge Anna J. Brown. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 54 and DIRECTS Defendants to provide a detailed accounting limited to the time they spent on Plaintiffs' clai ms for violation of Oregon's UTSA and breach of fiduciary duty together with supporting documentation no later than 06/3/2011. Any objections to Defendants' accounting limited to these two claims shall be filed no later than 06/10/2011. No reply permitted. Signed on 05/23/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See 12 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)

October 7, 2010

Filing 34 ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion 13 for Remand to State Court; GRANTS the Motion 9 for Summary Judgment of Defendants Dennis Healy, Holly Healy, Sky Corporation, Ltd., and RKD Premium Products, Inc.; and DENIES as futile Pla intiffs' Motion 24 for Leave to File [Second] Amended Complaint. The Court DIRECTS the parties to confer as to whether the Counterclaim will be pursued in light of the Court's rulings and as to whether any additional claims or defenses will be asserted by any party. the parties shall submit a joint status report no later than 10/29/2010, containing a proposed case management plan to address any remaining issues. Signed on 10/07/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See 37 page Order. (bb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith et al v. Healy et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?