PacifiCorp v. Northwest Pipeline GP et al
| 3:2010cv00099 |
| February 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 Natural Gas Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
503
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment 478 and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 489 are Denied. Signed on 1/14/14 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
409
OPINION & ORDER: Nmihwest's Bill of Costs 371 is Granted in Part and Denied in part, and Northwest is awarded its cost in the amount of $52,773.81. Northwest's motion for attorney's fees 375 is Granted in Part and Denied in Part, and Northwest is awarded its attorney's fees in the amount of $27,148.36. Signed on 12/10/12 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
361
OPINION & ORDER: Northwest's motion for summary judgment 243 is granted, and GTN and PacifiCorp's motions for summary judgment 251 & 253 are granted in part and denied in part. Northwest's motion for sanctions 279 is d enied as moot and GTN's motion for sanctions 284 is granted in part and denied in part. GTNs motion to stay proceedings and refer issues to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") 240 is granted, and the parties are or dered to refer this case to FERC requesting FERC exercise its primary jurisdiction to construe the phrase in GTN's tariff "commercially free from...objectionable substances...which may interfere with...its commercial utilization" a s applied to compressor oil. This action shall be stayed until FERC responds to the parties' request, except as set forth herein. PacifiCorp's motion to compel 194 evidence from Northwest is denied as moot and PacifiCorp's motion t o compel 196 evidence from GTN is granted in part and denied in part. All evidentiary objections not specifically addressed are denied as moot, with leave to reassert at a later stage in the proceeding. Signed on 7/16/12 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
171
OPINION & ORDER: Exchange of expert disclosures and reports will be as follows: Defendants' affirmative expert disclosures and accompanying reports required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) are due within seven days, in light of defe ndants' request for "reasonable additional time" to allow their experts to reconfigure their reports and segregate rebuttal issues from non-rebuttal issues. Plaintiff's rebuttal expert disclosures and reports are due within 28 days. Defendants' rebuttal expert disclosures and reports are due 75 days after the date of the November 9th ruling, by January 23,2012. The dispositive motion deadline is reset to February 22, 2012, 30 days after the deadline for defendants' rebuttal disclosures and reports, and expert discovery is allowed until that date. Signed on 11/17/11 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PacifiCorp v. Northwest Pipeline GP et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
