Brand v. Angus et al
| 3:2010cv00189 |
| February 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Ancer L. Haggerty |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motions to dismiss (doc. # 45 ) is GRANTED and Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. # 45 ) is GRANTED. Because the court does not consider the Childress Declaration or Exhibit 1 attached to the Childress Declaration, Plaintiff's motion to strike (doc. # 73 ) is DENIED as moot. Oral argument is unnecessary. See 25-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 6/11/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brand v. Angus et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
