Garratt-Callahan Company v. Itoh
Plaintiff: Garratt-Callahan Company
Defendant: Greg Itoh
Case Number: 3:2010cv00336
Filed: March 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis J. Hubel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Judgment of Dismissal. The Revised Stipulated Injunction 33 entered on July 20, 2010, expired on March 31, 2011, and no motion has been filed to initiate an extension. This action, therefore, is DISMISSED, with prejudice, and without costs or attorneys' fees to any party. See Judgment. Signed on 04/18/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garratt-Callahan Company v. Itoh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garratt-Callahan Company
Represented By: Daniel C. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Itoh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?