L&A Designs LLC et al v. Xtreme ATVs, Inc. et al
Wesley Alford and L&A Designs LLC |
Andrew R. Clunan and Xtreme ATVs, Inc. |
3:2010cv00627 |
June 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Garr M. King |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and claim five is dismissed; (2) Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is denied; (3) Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is grante d for claims one, four, and six on the issue of Defendants' liability related to the ladesigns.com website; and (4) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is otherwise denied. See 22-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 4/30/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Filing 92 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant Natalie Clunan's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction 60 is denied. See 11-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 3/20/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Filing 49 OPINION & ORDER: The court grants plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint 32 to add Natalie Clunan as a party defendant. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within five days of this order. See 5-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 11/28/2011 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.