Demont v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Donald Demont |
Lisa Ball, Sheila Grey, Megan Humphreys-Loving, Ryan Jasperson, Erin Kotchell and Starbucks Corporation |
3:2010cv00644 |
June 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Janice M. Stewart |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 Order. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation to remand. The Court DECLINES to adopt the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to deny Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs incurred as a result of Defendants' removal of this action to this Court. If the parties do not stipulate to attorneys' fees and costs by 12/30/2010, Plaintiff shall file no later than 1/7/2011, a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. Defendants' response, if any, shall be filed no later than 1/21/2011. Plaintiff may file a reply no later than 1/28/2011. Signed on 12/15/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown.See Order attached. (bb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.