Newell v. Tonkin Wilsonville Nissan, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel P. Newell
Defendant: Tonkin Wilsonville Nissan, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv00905
Filed: August 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Mosman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Stipulated Order of Dismissal: Granting Motion to Dismiss 11 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any party. Pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed on 6/3/11 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newell v. Tonkin Wilsonville Nissan, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel P. Newell
Represented By: Craig A Crispin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tonkin Wilsonville Nissan, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?