Gessele et al v. Jack In The Box Inc
| Ashley Gessele, Jessica Gessele and Tricia Tetrault |
| Jack In The Box Inc |
| 3:2010cv00960 |
| August 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Janice M. Stewart |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
293
Amended Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion 174 for Summary Judgment, DENIES as moot Plaintiffs Motion 276 to Strike, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs FLSA claims, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs state-law claims, and DENIES as moot all other pending Motions. See attached 56 page Amended Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
283
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion 174 for Summary Judgment, DENIES as moot Plaintiffs Motion 276 to Strike, DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiffs FLSA claims, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs state-law claims, and DENIES as moot all other pending Motions. Signed on 03/19/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 56 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
201
Order. The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Opinion and Order 191 granting Defendant's Motion 177 for Leave to Amend Answer. The Court directs counsel to confer and to submit no later than September 6, 2013, a jointly propose d briefing schedule for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. When the Motion is fully briefed, the Court will determine whether oral argument would be helpful. Signed on 08/27/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 11 page Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER: The Findings and Recommendation 158 is adopted in itsentirety. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 109 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Plaintiffs' proposed FLSA Workers' Benefit Fund and Sho e Collectives and Subcollectives are conditionally certified under § 216(b), and plaintiffs' proposed Rule 23(b)(3) Oregon Workers' Benefit Fund and Shoe Classes and Subclasses are certified. Jon M. Egan and his law firm are appointed as class counsel, and the named plaintiffs are appointed as class representatives. Signed on 4/1/2013 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (See Order, 12-pages) (ecp)
|
|
Filing
114
OPINION AND ORDER: Motion to Conditionally Reconsider Court's Ruling on Jack in the Box's Motion to Revise Case Schedule, to Offset the Advantage Defendant Gained by Its Delay 98 is DENIED. Signed on 8/24/12 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (jlr)
|
|
Filing
46
Opinion. Signed on 9/2/2011 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (ST)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER. The Findings and Recommendation 16 is adopted in its entirety. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First through Fifth Claims 8 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend the deficiencies in those claims within thirty days of this Order. Signed on 4/11/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
