Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. et al v. Continental Casualty Company et al
| Schnitzer Investment Corp. and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. |
| Continental Casualty Company and Transportation Insurance Company |
| 3:2010cv01174 |
| September 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
480
OPINION AND ORDER: I find that all of the factors from ORS § 20.075 that I am required to consider are either irrelevant, neutral or weigh in favor of granting Schnitzers petition for feesboth the fees it claims for litigating the case, and the fees it claims for preparing its fee petition. I order that the parties recalculate the total fees owed to Schnitzer based on the hours previously claimed, but with the rates for each timekeeper that I set out above. I will then review this calculation and award it as the reasonable attorney fees award in this case. Schnitzers Petition for Fees 449 is GRANTED according to the foregoing instructions. Signed on 11/12/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
242
STIPULATED ORDER RESOLVING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE RETROACTIVITY AND CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SB 814 237 . Signed on 10/25/13 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
181
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Papaks recommendation, except as regards Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment 67 . Except as noted, I ADOPT the conclusions of the F&R 124 as my own opinion. Plaintiffs motion fo r partial summary judgment 67 is DENIED in entirety because resolution of the issues raised is premature. Plaintiffs motion for leave to supplement the evidentiary record 118 is DENIED. Defendants motion for partial summary judgment 70 is DENIED. Plaintiffs motion to compel 84 is GRANTED IN PART. Additionally, defendants motion to strike 134 plaintiffs response to the objections is DENIED. Signed on 9/5/12 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation 54 . Signed on 11/29/11 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (cib)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
