Ranza v. Nike, Inc. et al
| Loredana Ranza |
| Nike European Operations Netherlands, B.V. and Nike, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01285 |
| October 18, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 215 . The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF 173 ) and DENIES Defendants' request for sanctions (ECF 210 , at 11-13). Signed on 11/5/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 192 . The Court DENIES AS UNTIMELY Plaintiff's motion for relief from final judgment (ECF 173 ) under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's motion may proceed on the merits under Rule 60(d)(3). Signed on 2/3/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 153 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Bill of Costs 145 and AWARDS Defendants costs in the amount of $2,193.42. Signed on 10/22/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
142
Amended Order. The Court ADOPTS in part Magistrate Judge Acostas Findingsand Recommendation 130 , concludes the Court lacks personal jurisdiction as to NEON, and concludes Plaintiff cannot state a claim against Defendants for violation of Title VII or the ADEA. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion 14 to Dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims with prejudice. The Court declines to enter a judgment at this time because Magistrate Judge Acosta took Plaintiff's Motion (#69) for Leave to File an Amended Complaint under advisement on January 4, 2013, pending the ruling by this Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed on 03/07/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS in part Magistrate Judge Acostas Findings and Recommendation 130 , concludes the Court lacks personal jurisdiction as to NEON, and concludes Plaintiff cannot state a claim against Defendants for violation of Title VI I or the ADEA. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion 14 to Dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims with prejudice. The Court declines to dismiss this matter in its entirety at this time because Magistrate Judge Acosta took Plaintiff's Motion 69 for Leave to File an Amended Complaint under advisement on January 4, 2013, pending the ruling by this Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed on 02/27/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
