Puri et al v. Khalsa et al
| Ranbir Singh Bhai, Kamaljit Kaur Kohli, Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri and Kulbir Singh Puri |
| Does 1-5, Karam Singh Khalsa, Kartar Singh Khalsa, Peraim Kaur Khalsa, Siri Karm Kaur Khalsa, Siri Ram Kaur Khalsa, Sopurkh Kaur Khalsa, Roy Lambert, Siri Singh Sahib Corporation and Unto Infinity, LLC |
| 3:2010cv01532 |
| December 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Ancer L. Haggerty |
| Civil (RICO) Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
458
OPINION AND ORDER - I GRANT in part and DENY in part the UI Defendants' Motions for Attorney Fees and Costs 438 and 441 . I decline to award attorney fees, but I award the UI Defendants $46,164.53 in costs. Signed on 7/27/2018 by Chief Judge Michael W. Mosman. (See attached 6-page Opinion and Order) (pg)
|
|
Filing
436
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, I GRANT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 390 , DENY Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 389 , and DENY or DENY as moot the parties' Motions to Strike [418, 424, 428]. This case is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed on 4/26/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
|
Filing
373
ORDER: Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation 372 , the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE any and all claims in this case between the plaintiffs and defendants Roy Lambert and Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt PC. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. Signed on 1/18/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
|
Filing
338
OPINION AND ORDER - The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) 305 , GRANTS in Part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 301 , and GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Regarding Scope of 30(b)(6) Deposition 328 . (See attached 6 page Opinion and Order). Signed on 12/20/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pg)
|
|
Filing
296
OPINION AND ORDER: I GRANT in part and DENY in part the Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion to Strike 245 filed by Defendants Kartar, Sopurkh, UI, Karm, Peraim, SSSC, and Karam; GRANT the Motion to Dismiss 247 filed by Defendants Hor owitz and Lane Powell; GRANT the Motion to Dismiss 249 filed by Defendant Ram; GRANT the Motion to Dismiss 250 filed by Defendants Schwabe and Lambert; and GRANT the Motion to Dismiss 257 filed by Defendants Gurudhan, EWTC, Hari, and Ajeet.... (see attached order for full details) Signed on 10/5/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
|
Filing
92
MINUTES of Proceedings: Motion Hearing held. Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss 41 ; Granting in Part Denying in Part 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss 67 ; Granting in Part Denying in Part 69 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Motion Hearing Held regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 69 , Motion to Dismiss 41 , Motion to Dismiss 67 , Motion to Dismiss for Fa ilure to State a Claim 45 . See order for full text. Surjit P. Soni present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Robert L. O'Halloran, Scoot Schnuck, Thomas Larkin, Christopher H. Kent, Peter D. Hawkes, Stephen C. Voorhees, and C. Robert Steringer present as counsel for defendant(s).(Court Reporter Bonita Shumway.) (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
