Wright v. The American's Bulletin et al
| Anthony Steven Wright |
| Cynthia Marie Brewer, The American's Bulletin and The American's Bulletin Newspaper Corp. |
| 3:2010cv06118 |
| December 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
427
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I ADOPT IN PART Magistrate Judge Papaks F&R 376 as my own opinion. Ms. Brewer's Motion to Compel 288 is DENIED without prejudice. Ms. Brewers Motion to Compel 291 is DENIED without prejudice. Plainti ffs Motion 308 for extension is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs Motion 312 to voluntarily dismiss certain of his claims isGRANTED, as stated in the F&R. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 332 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 335 is GRANTED. Plaint iffs Motion for Extension of Time 359 is GRANTED. The following documents are STRICKEN from the docket and shall be returned to the filing party: Ms. Brewers Motion to Strike Order or Make Payment for Order for Payment of Copy and Mail Fees 285 ; Ms. Brewers Memo in Support 286 ; Ms. Brewers Affidavit in Support 287 ; Ms. Brewers Notice 295 ; Ms. Brewers Notice 296 ; plaintiffs Notice 300 ;plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 305 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 306 ; plaintiffs Objectio ns 314 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 315 ; plaintiffs Affidavit in Support 316 ; plaintiffs Objection 322 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 323 ; plaintiffs Affidavit in Support 324 ; plaintiffs Objection 326 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 327 ; plain tiffs Affidavit in Support 328 ; plaintiffs Objection 329 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 330 ; plaintiffs Affidavit in Support 331 ; plaintiffs Objections 339 ; plaintiffs Memo of Objections 340 ; plaintiffsAffidavit in Support 341 ; plaintiffs Objections 345 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 346 ; plaintiffs Declaration 347 ; plaintiffs Objections 351 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 352 ; plaintiffs Affidavit in Support 353 ; plaintiffs Motion 354 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 355 ; plainti ffs Affidavit in Support 356 ; plaintiffs Objection 363 ; plaintiffs Memo in Support 364 ; plaintiffs Affidavit in Support 365 plaintiffs Certificate of Service 366 . Plaintiffs breach of contract claim is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all def endants. Defendant Dean Beeson is DISMISSED with prejudice as a defendant in this action. Ms. Brewer shall respond tothe discovery requests that are the subject of plaintiffs Motion to Compel 332 and plaintiffs Motion to Compel 335 within eleven days. Ms. Brewer shall tender payment to plaintiff in the total amount of $9.44 in valid currency or by valid negotiable instrument within thirty days. The Courts order 368 dated February 8, 2012, shall not be amended to direct Ms. Brewer to tender payment in the total amount of $32.28, as opposed to $17.38. Signed on 4/12/12 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
349
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Papaks F&R 277 as my own opinion. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 203 is GRANTED; within thirty days, defendant shall respond to plaintiffs subject discovery requests and shall reimburs e plaintiff's costs incurred in connection with bringing this motion in the amount of $17.38. Plaintiffs construed Motion for Reconsideration 226 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 229 is DENIED AS MOOT, and the clerk of cou rt should return the subject proposed motion and supporting materials to plaintiff. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 232 is also DENIED AS MOOT, and the clerk of court should similarly return the subject proposed motion and supporting materials to plain tiff. Plaintiffs construed Motion for Sanctions 234 is DENIED. Defendant is ordered to show cause within thirty days why she should not be found in contempt of court, as detailed in Magistrate Judge Papaks F&R. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 238 to issue a subpoena duces tecum is DENIED with leave to refile. Defendants Motion for Leave 242 is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 243 is DENIED. Plaintiffs construed Motion for Sanctions 246 is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 248 is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 250 to issue a subpoena duces tecum is DENIED with leave to refile. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 252 to issue a subpoena duces tecum is DENIED with leave to refile. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave [2 54] to move for a default judgment is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 256 to take depositions is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave 258 to issue a subpoena duces tecum is DENIED with leave to refile. Plaintiff's "Motion for Inspect ion and Discovery of Facts" 260 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs "Motion for Claim" 264 is DENIED. Plaintiffs "Motion for Execution and Enforcement of Claim in Anticipatory Repudiation" 267 is DENIED. Plaintiffs "Motion to Compel Execution and Enforcement of Contract" 271 is DENIED. Signed on 1/23/12 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
222
OPINION & ORDER: Wright's Amended Complaint 202 is Stricken from the docket, Wright shall have thirty (30) days from the date hereof within which to file with the court an amended pleading intended to supercede in its entirety Wright& #039;s complaint as originally filed, or, in the alternative, that he intends to abandon all claims set forth in his complaint as originally filed and to proceed on a single claim for breach of contract, and the Clerk of Court is Directed to return to Wright the undocketed materials identified above. Signed on 8/30/11 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
219
AMENDED OPINION & ORDER: Wright's motion 210 for "Leave for Sanctions" is construed as a request for leave to move for imposition of sanctions, the motion so construed is Denied, and the Clerk of Court is Directed to return to Wright the memorandum and affidavit filed in support of the motion; Wright's motion 211 for "Leave to Compel...Brewer to Serve Plaintiff Pleadings" is construed as a request for leave to move for an order compelling Brewer to serve her filings in this action on Wright, the motion so construed is Denied, and the Clerk of Court is Directed to return to Wright the memorandum and affidavit filed in support of the motion; and Wright's motion 212 for "Leave for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions" is construed as a request for leave to move for extension of case deadlines, the motion so construed is Granted, the Clerk of Court is Directed to docket Wright's memorandum and affidavit filed in support of the motion, and the subject motion for extension of case deadlines is granted. All pretrial, discovery, and dispositive motions in this action are due by 9/26/2011. Signed on 8/26/11 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
197
OPINION & ORDER: Wright's Motion to Compel 155 is Granted, and Defendant Brewer's filing 167 , dated June 29, 2011, is Denied as Moot. Brewer is directed to respond to Wright's First Interrogatories and to reimburse Wright for his reasonable expenses incurred in connection with bringing his motion in the amount of $15.00, within thirty days of the date hereof. Signed on 8/8/11 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
147
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Papaks recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 129 as my own opinion, 33 , 49 , 53 , 54 , 58 , 60 , 71 , 73 , 79 , 83 , 88 , 90 , 91 , 93 , 95 , 96 , 98 , 101 , 103 , 109 , 110 , 113 , 118 , 120 , 123 , and 125 . Signed on 6/2/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
36
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant The American's Bulletin is Ordered to showcause within thirty days why default should not be entered against it in this action, and Plaintiff Wright's motion 17 for determination of money damages, motion 19 for partial summary judgment, and motion 26 for default judgment are each Denied. Signed on 12/22/10 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
