Coultas v. Payne et al
| Lyle Mark Coultas |
| Department of the Oregon State Police, Curt Gilbert, Russel Ludwig, Steven Payne, State of Oregon, Carroll Tichenor, Yamhill County District Attorney's Office, Yamhill County Jail and Yamhill County Sheriff Department |
| 3:2011cv00045 |
| January 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, Defendant's motion 159 is GRANTED. Coultas's remaining claim is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 15th day of August, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta.(copy of this opinion and order mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg)
|
|
Filing
169
OPINION and ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 140 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 12th day of May, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy of this document mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg)
|
|
Filing
137
OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' Tichenor and Payne's Motion to Dismiss 125 is GRANTED, and the court will enter a judgment dismissing Tichenor and Payne as defendants to this case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
113
OPINION and ORDER - State Defendants' Request/Motion for Judicial Notice 106 is GRANTED. However, the court concludes Coultas's § 1983 claims against Tichenor and Payne are not Heck-barred. Therefore, the court DENIES in part State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 22 . IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2015, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, the State Defendants' Motion for Entry of Final Judgment 73 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of May, 2013, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy of this opinion and order mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg)
|
|
Filing
71
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, Coultas's motion to supplement 66 is GRANTED and Coultas's motion for reconsideration 68 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 19th day of September 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copies of opinions and orders (#70 and #71) mailed to plaintiff this date. (peg)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, DOJ Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED. Dated this 12th day of December, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
