Obsidian Finance Group, LLC et al v. Cox
Plaintiff: |
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC and Kevin D. Padrick |
Defendant: |
Crystal Cox |
Case Number: |
3:2011cv00057 |
Filed: |
January 14, 2011 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Office: |
Portland (3) Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Marco A. Hernandez |
Nature of Suit: |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 25, 2014 |
Filing
207
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's motion for summary judgment 198 and motion for court trial/objection to jury trial 190 are denied. See 6-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 7/25/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
March 27, 2012 |
Filing
123
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's motion for new trial 105 is denied. Signed on 3/27/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. See 34-page opinion & order attached. Copy mailed to defendant Crystal Cox. (mr)
|
January 23, 2012 |
Filing
114
ORDER: Plaintiffs' supplemental motion for fees and costs 98 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs are awarded $4,911.57 as against defendant for defendant's failure to appear at her deposition. See 10-page order attached. Signed on 1/23/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy emailed to defendant Crystal Cox. (mr)
|
November 30, 2011 |
Filing
95
OPINION: Based on the evidence presented at the time of trial, I conclude that plaintiffs are not public figures, defendant is not "media," and the statements at issue were not made on an issue of public concern. Thus, there are no F irst Amendment implications. Defendant's other defenses of absolute privilege, Oregon's Shield Law, Oregon's Anti-SLAPP statute, and Oregon's retraction statutes, are not applicable. See 13-page opinion attached. Signed on 11/30/2011 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of opinion mailed and emailed to defendant. (mr)
|
October 18, 2011 |
Filing
44
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss, or alternatively for summary judgment 36 , is granted and all of defendant's counterclaims are dismissed. See 8-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of order mailed and emailed to defendant. (mr)
|
August 23, 2011 |
Filing
31
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiffs' July 22, 2011 Opposition Memorandum 27 is construed as a supplemental motion for summary judgment as to the blog posts not previously submitted with plaintiffs' original summary judgment m otion, and as so construed, is denied. Summary judgment independent of the motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f), is granted to defendant as to all blog posts other than the December 25, 2010 blog post appearing on the "bankruptcycorruption.com" website. The Court will promptly set a telephone scheduling conference to establish a case schedule for trial. See 31-page opinion and order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
July 7, 2011 |
Filing
26
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment 9 is denied. See 16-page opinion and order attached. Signed on 7/7/2011 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?