United States of America v. Neal et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Hoevet & Boise, P.C., Michael Neal, Shannon Neal, Terry L. Neal, Neal Family Trust, Steve Martin Construction, Inc., Badger Creek Nursery, LLC and Clackamas County
Case Number: 3:2011cv00353
Filed: March 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 JUDGMENT (Granting the stipulated motion for entry of judgment 28 against Terry L. Neal and foreclosure of U.S. Tax Liens on real property). IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the United States and against Terry L. Neal, (see attached document for details). Dated this 1st day of June, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES and BADGER CREEK NURSERY, LLC - (Grant Motion to Dismiss 19 . Defendant Badger Creek Nursery, LLC is DISMISSED with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. Dated this 5th day of May, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES and STEVE MARTIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. - (Granting Motion to Dismiss 18 .) Defendant Steve Martin Construction, Inc. is DISMISSED with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. Dated this 4th day of May, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
April 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN U.S.A. and HOEVET & BOISE, P.C. - (Granting the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss 12 defendatn Hoevet & Boise, P.C. with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 28th day of April, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
April 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER - GRANTING the Stipulation Motion 10 to Dismiss Michael Neal as the personal representative of the estate of Maureen Gail Neal, deceased. The Stipulation Re: Disclaimer of Interest by Michael Neal as Personal Representative of the Est ate of Maureen Gail Neal, Deceased, is hereby approved. Defendant Michael Neal in his capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maureen Gail Neal, Deceased is DISMISSED with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 21st day of April, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Neal et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hoevet & Boise, P.C.
Represented By: Ronald H. Hoevet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shannon Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry L. Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neal Family Trust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Martin Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Badger Creek Nursery, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clackamas County
Represented By: Stephen Lewis Madkour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Quinn P. Harrington
Represented By: Jeremy N. Hendon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?