Jackson et al v. Rainer School District No. 13 et al
| Denning Jackson, Kim Jackson and Bailey Jackson |
| Rainier School Board, Rainier School District No. 13 and R. Michael Carter |
| 3:2011cv00602 |
| May 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Marco A. Hernandez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
Opinion & Order: The motion for a preliminary injunction [#3] is denied. See 6-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
7
Temporary Restraining Order: From 4:30 p.m. on May 20, 2011 until 5:00 p.m. on May 31, 2011, Defendants are prohibited from taking any action that would prevent Bailey Jackson from completing her senior year of high school as a regularly atte nding student and to graduate with her peers. Defendants are ordered to appear in this Court on Tuesday, May 31, 2011, at 2:30 p.m., to show cause why this Court should not issue a preliminary injunction in accordance with this temporary restraining order. Defendants shall file a brief in response by Thursday, May 26, 2011. Plaintiffs will be given the opportunity to reply to Defendants response at the hearing on May 31, 2011. See full document attached. Signed on 5/20/2011 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
