Harris v. Ja-Ru Corporation
Plaintiff: Anthony Harris
Defendant: Ja-Ru Corporation
Case Number: 3:2011cv01071
Filed: September 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Paul Papak
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's Petition for Attorney Fees 29 is Granted, and Defendant is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $4,578.00. This award is meted against Plaintiff's counsel Mr. Timothy Vanagas and not against Plaintiff. Payment shall be made to Defense counsel within 60 days of this order. Signed on 4/4/13 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Ja-Ru Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ja-Ru Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Harris
Represented By: Timothy J. Vanagas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?