Lalack v. State of Oregon et al
| Tammy Lalack |
| Kenneth Jeske, Oregon Youth Authority, State of Oregon and Fariborz Pakseresht |
| 3:2011cv01285 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
(REDACTED) Opinion and Order of Opinion and Order 84 filed January 30, 2013. Signed on 01/30/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
85
Judgment. Based on the Court's Order issued October 11, 2012, and the Court's Opinion and Order issued January 28, 2013, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Claims without prejudice and DISMISSES Plaintiff's First, Third, Seventh, and Eighth Claims with prejudice. Signed on 01/30/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER:. For the reasons indicated, the Court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's First, Seventh, and Eighth claims as to the State, and dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth claims. Oral argument set for 11/6/2012 is stricken. Plaintiff's supplemental response memo due no later than 10/23/2012, and defendant's supplemental reply memo due by 11/5/2012, both memos not to exceed 10 pages. Signed on 10/11/2012 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (sm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
