Millbrooke v. City of Canby et al
Andrew Millbrooke |
Bret Smith, City of Canby and Officer Murphy |
3:2012cv00168 |
January 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
John V. Acosta |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 53 . Millbrooke's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 46 is DENIED. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 52 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 44 . Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART as to Defendants' qualified immunity affirmative defense and DENIED on all other grounds 29 ; and (2) Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment Monell violation and negligence claims 19 . Signed on 1/24/14 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 41 ORDER: Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 19 ); Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 29 ). Signed on 12/11/2013 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (ac4) Modified on 12/11/2013. Modified on 12/11/2013 (ac4). (Main Document 41 replaced on 12/11/2013) (eo). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.