Exit 282A Development Company, LLC et al v. Worrix et al
| Exit 282A Development Company, LLC and LFGC, LLC |
| Bob Austin, Jim Bernard, Rex Burkholder, Clackamas County, Carlotta Collette, Shirley Craddick, Barton Eberwein, Kathryn Harrington, Carl Hosticka, Tom Hughes, Hanley Jenkins, Tim Josi, Charlotte Lehan, Robert Liberty, Ann Lininger, Greg MacPherson, Rod Park, Christine M. Pellett, Lynn Peterson, Barbara Roberts, Paul Savas, John Vanlandingham and Marilyn Worrix |
| 3:2012cv00939 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael H. Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Clackamas County Defendants Motion 136 for Summary Judgment, the State Defendants Motion 149 for Judgment on the Pleadings (converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment), and the Metro Defendants Motion [150 ] for Judgment on the Pleadings (converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment). The Court, therefore, DISMISSES this matter without prejudice and with leave to re-file in the event that Plaintiffs claims remain viable after Defendants have rendered a final decision regarding the urban- and rural-reserve designations in the Portland metropolitan area.Signed on 09/28/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
111
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Metro Defendants Motion 69 for Judicial Notice; DENIES the Motion 64 to Dismiss of Metro Defendants joined in part by State Defendants; and DENIES the Motion 66 to Dismiss of State Defendants joined in part by Metro Defendants. Signed on 11/13/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 31 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER: The Court strikes Clackamas County Defendants' Motion 80 for Partial Summary Judgment. Clackamas County Defendants have leave to file a new such Motion. New such Motion is due 7/11/2013; Plaintiffs' opposition is due 7/25 /2013; Clackamas County Defendants' reply is due 8/1/2013. The Court will hear oral argument on this to-be-filed Motion on 8/15/2013, at 1:30 p.m. The Court denies Plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees in connection with the conferr al dispute. The Court denies Clackamas County Defendants' Motion 60 to Strike for lack of merit. Replies still outstanding on all other pending Motions 64 , 66 , 69 , 78 are due 7/11/2013. These Motions will be argued at the time set on 8/15/2013. No later than 7/11/2013, and again on 8/13/2013, the parties shall file with the Court a Joint Status Report explaining their progress to-date in moving this matter forward and identifying any obstacle or issue as to which the Court may be of assistance. See attached Order for full text. (bb) Stephen English, Kristina Holm present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Jacqueline Kamins, Stephen Madkour, Alex Gordon, Roger Alfred present as counsel for defendant(s).(Court Reporter Amanda LeGore.) (bb)
|
|
Filing
53
Opinion and Order: The Court DENIES Defendants Joint Motion 16 to Dismiss and DECLINES TO ABSTAIN from litigating Plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Article I, Section 20, of the Oregon Constitution. The Court DIRECTS Plaint iffs to file an amended complaint no later than April 6, 2013. The Court DENIES Clackamas County Defendants Motion 14 to Dismiss. The Court will set a Rule 16 Conference shortly to determine the case-management deadlines. Signed on 03/01/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 22 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
