Coultas v. Payne et al
Lyle Mark Coultas |
Yamhill County District Attorney's Office, Kenneth Crowley, Louis Fasano, John Kroger, Oregon Department of Justice, Oregon State Bar, Oregon State Police, Steven Payne, State of Oregon and Carroll Tichenor |
3:2012cv01132 |
June 22, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
John V. Acosta |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 59 . Plaintiff's motion to amend his Complaint 49 is DENIED. The Court further finds that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed on 10/28/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 63 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 55 . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 31 is GRANTED, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court further finds that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed on 9/30/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 47 OPINION and ORDER - The Court Orders that Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 40 are ADOPTED. Defendant Oregon State Bar's Motion to Dismiss 27 is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.