Ouma v. Clackamas County et al
| Washie Ouma |
| John Does, 1-9, Rob Gordon, Craig Roberts, Washington County and Clackamas County |
| 3:2012cv01465 |
| August 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Marco A. Hernandez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss John Doe Defendants 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and Plaintiff's third claim. Additionally, based on reasons previously stated, John Does 1, 2, and 3 are dismissed, Clackamas Countys motion 37 f or summary judgment is granted, and Washington County's motion for summary judgment 45 is granted. Therefore, Plaintiff's first and second claims are also dismissed. See 13-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 5/7/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant Clackamas County's motion to dismiss 25 is denied. See 3-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 9/3/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motions to dismiss ( 9 and 11 ) are GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within three weeks of the date of this order. See 5-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
