CHMM, LLC v. Freeman Marine Equipment, Inc.
Plaintiff: CHMM, LLC
Defendant: Freeman Marine Equipment, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv01484
Filed: August 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Janice M. Stewart
Nature of Suit: Marine Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewarts Findings and Recommendation 70 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Motion 65 for Summary Judgment and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(3), GRANTS ACE leave to ratify or to join this action as a named plaintiff. Signed on 11/20/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 2 page Order for full text. (bb)
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 51 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part Defendant's Motion 41 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint as to that portion of Plaintiff 's Sixth Claim alleging breach of a quasi-contract, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty of seaworthiness, and DENIES in partDefendant's Motion 41 to Dismiss as to that portion of Plaintiff's Sixth Claim alleging breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for the intended purpose. Signed on 06/14/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 2 page Order for full text. (bb)
February 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewarts Findings andRecommendation 28 , GRANTS Defendant's Motion 11 to Dismiss as to Plaintiff's First through Fifth Claims for damage to property installed on and integrated into the V essel prior to its delivery by Nobiskrug to Plaintiff, GRANTS Defendant's Motion 11 as to that portion of Plaintiff's Sixth Claim alleging a breach of contract, and DENIES the remaining portions of Defendant's Motion as to Plaintiff& #039;s other claims. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint no later than 2/21/2013, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks tort remedies for damage to "other property" added after delivery of the Vessel by Nobiskrug to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff does not file a Second Amended Complaint, this matter will proceed on the remaining claims in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed on 02/07/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHMM, LLC v. Freeman Marine Equipment, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freeman Marine Equipment, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHMM, LLC
Represented By: David R. Boyajian
Represented By: Brian P.R. Eisenhower
Represented By: Noah Jarrett
Represented By: Daniel F. Knox
Represented By: Anthony J. Pruzinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?