Garmon v. Plaid Pantries, Inc.
||Plaid Pantries, Inc.
||August 28, 2012
||Oregon District Court
||Portland (3) Office
||John V. Acosta
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 19, 2013
OPINION and ORDER Plaid's motion 12 for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to Garmon's claims under the Federal Act, the State Act, and the Whistleblower Statute based on Plaid's failure to schedule Garmon for full-time w ork and refusal to promote him to store manager because of his part-time hours and resulting inability to perform assistant manager tasks, and GRANTED in all other respects. Plaid's motion to stike, found in it's reply brief is GRANTED with regard to paragraphs 120 and 121 of Garmon's affidavit but DENIED in all other respects. DATED this 19th day of July, 2013, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.