Roberts et al v. Heating Specialist Inc. et al
| Nancy Roberts and George Roberts |
| Heating Specialist Inc., Robert Gordon and IRS Environmental of Portland, Inc. |
| Robert Gordon, Heating Specialist Inc. and IRS Environmental of Portland, Inc. |
| Robert Gordon, Heating Specialist Inc. and IRS Environmental of Portland, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv01820 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael H. Simon |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9601 CERCLA Hazardous Waste Cleanup Costs |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law - Based on the evidence presented at trial, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have met their burden in proving that Defendant THS is liable under Section 113 of CERCLA. Further, the Court finds that THS is respon sible for 60 percent of past and future response costs incurred at the Property, and Plaintiffs are responsible for 40 percent of such costs. The Court orders the parties to submit a proposed judgment consistent with the Court's Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law within fourteen (14) days of this Opinion and Order. Signed on 8/5/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
47
Opinion and Order - Defendant THS's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is DENIED. Signed on 4/29/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
