Vickers v. Jensrud, et al
| Theodore Vickers |
| Officer J. Jensrud and John Does 1-20 |
| 3:2012cv02102 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael W. Mosman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER. Mr. Vickers has failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Officer Jensrud knew of a substantial risk of serious harm and as to whether he failed to respond reasonably to such a risk. In addition, Mr. Vickers does not dispute that he encountered any such risk voluntarily. As the Doe defendants are concerned, Mr. Vickers has not argued that any Sheridan official aside from Officer Jensrud displayed deliberate indifference. Defendants motion for summary judgment on Mr. Vickerss Bivens claim is GRANTED. Signed on 6/9/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER: Because the parties have submitted extensive materials outside the complaint, Defendants motion to dismiss 27 Mr. Vickerss Bivens claim under Rule 12(b)(6) is converted into one for summary judgment. The parties will have an opportunity to submit additional evidenceand argument. Defendants motion to dismiss Mr. Vickerss negligence claim against the United States is GRANTED for lack of jurisdiction, and the claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed on 11/13/13 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
