Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc. v. Excel Trade, LLC

Plaintiff: Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc.
Defendant: Excel Trade, LLC
Case Number: 3:2012cv02194
Filed: December 4, 2012
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Paul Papak
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 30, 2013 29 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 16 is Granted as to Excel's affirmative defense of unjust enrichment only, and is otherwise Denied. Signed on 10/30/13 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc. v. Excel Trade, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc.
Represented By: David D. VanSpeybroeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Excel Trade, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?