Ovitsky v. Washington County Victim Assistance et al
Plaintiff: Abby Jo Ovitsky
Defendant: Washington County Victim Assistance, Michele C Rini and Washington County Sheriff's Office
Case Number: 3:2012cv02250
Filed: December 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER: BSD's motions to strike the SAC and dismiss the FAC 78 and 93 are granted. As a result, plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Jerry Brown 98 , Jerry Brown's motion to quash ineffective service 99 , and J ohn Kitzhaber's motion for joinder in BSD's motion to dismiss 103 are denied as moot. Any motion to amend the FAC is due within 20 days of the date of this opinion and must be filed in accordance with this Court's orders, as well as the federal and local rules of civil procedure; failure to do so will result in automatic denial of that motion and dismissal of this lawsuit with prejudice. See formal order. Copy of this order sent to Pro Se Plaintiff. Signed on 2/3/2014 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER: Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency Preliminary Injunction and for Rule 11 Sanctions 80 . Remaining issue is the Beaverton School District's motion to dismiss 78 . Any response to that motion is due within 30 days of the date of this order. Likewise, any motion to amend the First Amended Complaint is due within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed on 9/16/2013 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION and ORDER: Granting County's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 50 ; Granting State's Motion to Dismiss 63 . Therefore, plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to all claims asserted against the County and the State. Further, WCSD is dismissed as a defendant in this action with prejudice. Signed on 8/20/2013 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg) Modified on 8/22/2013 to add language (lg).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ovitsky v. Washington County Victim Assistance et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington County Victim Assistance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michele C Rini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abby Jo Ovitsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?