Hill v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff: James N. Hill
Case Number: 3:2012cv02309
Filed: December 20, 2012
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis J. Hubel
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 11, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATED ORDER: Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint; pending motions are denied as moot. (In re Motion to Dismiss 4 , and Motion to Remand Case to State Court 6 .) Signed on 2/11/13 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (kb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Represented By: Katherine S. Somervell
Represented By: Jamie L. Pfeiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James N. Hill
Represented By: James L. Buchal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?