Alfano et al v. Pagnano et al
| David Alfano, Mary Alfano-Lupton, Lisa Alfano and Steven Alfano |
| Pat Terrell, Jim Willis, Richard Pagnano, Helen Ireland, Sybille Baer, Ziggy Szcczepanski, Kathy Andreas, Oregon Department of Veterans Affairs, Chris Farley, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Kevin Carlson |
| 3:2012cv02319 |
| December 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
OPINION & ORDER: Farley's motion to dismiss 62 and request for judicial notice 65 are Granted. Because plaintiffs have failed to state plausible claims to relief, the third amended complaint 58 is Dismissed as to all defendants. In light of the findings above and the number of times plaintiffs have already amended their complaint, further amendment is unwarranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Accordingly, the third amended complaint is Dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend and a final judgment should be prepared. Signed on 4/29/14 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER - The Court REMANDS the Findings and Recommendation (ECF 75 ) to Judge Papak to be issued as an Opinion and Order. Signed on 4/25/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
