Benton v. John Doe 1 et al
| Gregory Benton |
| John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| 3:2013cv00613 |
| April 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Janice M. Stewart |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (ECF # 153 ) is DENIED, defendant's alternative motion to disqualify plaintiff from the pro bono program (ECF # 153 ) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's motion for pro bono representation (ECF # 156 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 3/5/2018 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Copy mailed to plaintiff). (pvh)
|
|
Filing
146
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant McDonald's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF # 126 ) is GRANTED. Signed on 12/12/2017 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings & Recommendation 128 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 111 is denied and Plaintiff's Alternative Motion to Dismiss 111 is granted. Signed on 10/12/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (joha)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation 34 . Accordingly, Defendant City of Portland's motion to dismiss 20 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (1) the Second Claim for Relief is dismissed with prejudice as against the City of Portland and John Doe 2 to the extent he is alleged to be a member of the Portland Police Bureau; and (2) the Third Claim for Relief is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to replead within 30 d ays after the date of this Order, to either identify the John Doe Defendants or to clarify the specific factual allegations made against a member of the Portland Police Bureau. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 4/7/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation 4 . Accordingly, the Complaint 1 is dismissed. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time 7 is construed as a motion to allow sufficient time to file an amended complaint and is granted. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this Order in which to file an amended complaint. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 5/14/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of order mailed to plaintiff. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
