Klahn v. Clackamas County Bank et al
| Laurie Klahn and Daniel P. Klahn, Sr. |
| Clackamas County Bank, Cable Huston Benedick Haagensen & Lloyd, LLP and Laura J. Walker |
| 3:2013cv00621 |
| April 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Janice M. Stewart |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER: Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions 78 . Signed on 1/2/2014 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (ST)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER: Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 65 . The only remaining claim is part of Claim 4 alleging intentional interference with Plaintiff's tenant-landlord relationship. See the attachment for further details. Signed on 12/12/2013 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (ST)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER : Klahn's Motion for an Emergency Order (docket #45) is DENIED; Cable Huston and Walker's Motion to Dismiss (docket #31) is GRANTED and those defendants are dismissed with prejudice, and the Bank's Motion to Dismiss (docket #36) is GRANTED with leave granted to the Klahns to file an Amended Complaint by August 23, 2013. The failure to timely file an Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this case. Signed on 7/24/13 by Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart. (jlr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
